Skip to content

[MOB-12191] add-tests-for-iterableinboxdatamodel#715

Open
lposen wants to merge 5 commits into
feature/MOB-12190-add-tests-to-iterableinappmessagefrom
feature/MOB-12191-add-tests-for-iterableinboxdatamodel
Open

[MOB-12191] add-tests-for-iterableinboxdatamodel#715
lposen wants to merge 5 commits into
feature/MOB-12190-add-tests-to-iterableinappmessagefrom
feature/MOB-12191-add-tests-for-iterableinboxdatamodel

Conversation

@lposen

@lposen lposen commented Oct 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔹 JIRA Ticket(s) if any

✏️ Description

Add tests for IterableInboxDataModel

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Lines Statements Branches Functions
Coverage: 62%
62.42% (299/479) 35.97% (68/189) 58.33% (91/156)

@qltysh

qltysh Bot commented Oct 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Diff Coverage: Not applicable. There was no coverage data reported for the files in this diff.

Total Coverage: This PR will increase coverage by 8.85%.

File Coverage Changes
Path File Coverage Δ Indirect
src/inbox/classes/IterableInboxDataModel.ts 93.3
🛟 Help
  • Diff Coverage: Coverage for added or modified lines of code (excludes deleted files). Learn more.

  • Total Coverage: Coverage for the whole repository, calculated as the sum of all File Coverage. Learn more.

  • File Coverage: Covered Lines divided by Covered Lines plus Missed Lines. (Excludes non-executable lines including blank lines and comments.)

    • Indirect Changes: Changes to File Coverage for files that were not modified in this PR. Learn more.

This is from Qlty Cloud, the successor to Code Climate Quality. Learn more.

@lposen lposen added the tests This issue or PR concerns test coverage. If PR, it should only contain tests. label Oct 14, 2025
…to feature/MOB-12191-add-tests-for-iterableinboxdatamodel
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

tests This issue or PR concerns test coverage. If PR, it should only contain tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant